Paul Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement-en.svg
I am old enough to have discovered rather more often than I’d like to admit that I’m wrong. But given our fallible natures, I’m not often upset when people disagree with me.
Except when people make pronouncements that are simply contradicted by the facts. You know, the “don’t distract me with the facts, I’ve already made up my mind” approach. If people don’t believe climate change is occurring, they don’t know the facts. Or if they don’t think it’s at least partly caused by human actions, given what we know today, it takes a lot of explaining.
But climate-change deniers are amateurs compared to Steven Emerson. How could someone who calls himself an expert on terrorism say on Fox News that only Muslims live in Birmingham, and that non-Muslims never go into the city? Or that in London Muslim religious police patrol the streets and beat “anyone who doesn’t dress according to religious Muslim attire”?
Okay, so Emerson apologized for his error. That’s not good enough.
I’ve never had a whole lot of respect for Fox News. But what kind of responsible network ever identified this man as an expert on terrorism in the first place? I think the blame doesn’t stop with Emerson. And I don’t think an apology is enough. I think Fox News needs to investigate its principles of journalism.
Still, the avalanche of ridicule from Twitter after Emerson’s comment is satisfying. As ju suis charlie says, ridicule can be a powerful force.