My husband and I were watching the film, The DaVinci Code, this evening, which includes some graphic demonstrations of neurotic – possibly even psychotic – practices of masochism by an Opus Dei fanatic. Peter asked me, given my nine years in the convent, what I knew about activities like these which the popular media suggests are not fanciful.
Initially it seems the answer was obvious: Maryknoll, the order of nuns to which I belonged did not inflict or ever to my knowledge encourage or even condone any kind of physical punishments like flagellations or hidden instruments by which one might experience pain. I know myself well enough to know I would have walked out the door immediately had there been even a whiff of that kind of thing.
And yet – and yet – and yet… there was something. There was an attitude that in some ways reflects the acceptance of a male-dominated, domineering bullying that suggested us mere lowly women should be subservient to higher authority. That said we were not worthy to stand as equals to priests, and certainly not to the exclusively male hierarchy of bishops and cardinals and the pope. And there were practices that were deliberately created to remind us of our sinfulness, of our unworthiness, of our self-pride that must be destroyed.
The Chapter of Faults, for instance, was a weekly gathering in which we sat in two rows facing each other with our Superior seated at the head beneath a crucifix displayed overhead. One by one we each stood up and accused ourselves of our indiscretions of the past week, and then prostated ourselves at full stretch on the floor asking for forgiveness. The sins we most often accused ourselves of were trivial and would be laughable if the purpose of the self-accusations were not, in retrospect, so destructive. Things like “talking in two’s.” Talking to another nun when a third person was not present was forbidden – presumably to avoid any possibility of a developing a lesbian relationship. Another frequent sin one could always rely on should one be casting around for something of sufficient weight to report was breaking “custody of the eyes.” This meant raising one’s eyes from the floor and looking around when it was, strictly speaking, done out of sheer interest in one’s surroundings and not out of necessity to avoid actually running into someone or something.
We were assigned a penance, usually a few prayers, and admonished to do better in the future. Today, the whole process sounds eerily similar to the brainwashing techniques used by the Communists to change the views of the unreconstructed.
So though I’ve never seen it, I’m pretty sure there are people today in the Catholic Church who take these attitudes to their logical extremes and engage in most of the practices attributed to the followers of Opus Dei. I do suspect they are a minority, rather like the Islamic terrorists who don’t represent mainstream Islamic attitudes.
But in both religions, a small virulent minority can have a disproportionate and vicious influence. I do not dismiss them lightly.